How Green Marketing Affects Millennials’ Willingness to Buy Eco-Friendly Products
Isi Artikel Utama
Abstrak
This study investigates the impact of green marketing dimensions green product, green price, green promotion, and green place on the purchase intention of eco-friendly products among millennial consumers in Nigeria, with a focus on environmental awareness as a moderating variable. Environmental degradation and sustainability concerns have prompted increasing consumer awareness, particularly among millennials, of the ecological impact of their consumption patterns. However, a green attitude-behavior gap exists, where awareness does not always translate into purchase decisions. This research aims to empirically examine how each dimension of green marketing influences purchase intention and how environmental awareness strengthens or weakens these relationships. Using a cross-sectional survey design and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), data was collected from 450 millennial consumers in Nigeria. The findings reveal that green product, green price, green promotion, and green place all positively affect purchase intention, with green product and promotion having the most significant impact. Additionally, environmental awareness enhances the influence of green marketing dimensions on purchase intention, particularly strengthening the effects of green product, promotion, and place. However, its influence on green price was not significant. These results suggest that companies seeking to improve the purchase intention of eco-friendly products should focus on the authenticity of green products and the credibility of green promotions while fostering consumer environmental awareness. This study contributes to the literature on green consumer behavior, particularly in developing countries, and offers practical insights for businesses to design more effective sustainable marketing strategies.
Unduhan
Rincian Artikel

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors submitting a manuscript do so with the understanding that if accepted for publication, the copyright of the article shall be assigned to the PEARL Journal, LPPM Universitas Buddhi Dharma as the publisher of the journal.
Copyright encompasses exclusive rights to reproduce and deliver the article in all forms and media, including reprints, photographs, microfilms, and any other similar reproductions, as well as translations. The reproduction of any part of this journal, its storage in databases, and its transmission by any form or media, such as electronic, electrostatic and mechanical copies, photocopies, recordings, magnetic media, etc., will be allowed only with written permission from the PEARL Journal.
The PEARL Journal, the editors, and the advisory editorial board make every effort to ensure that no incorrect or misleading data, opinions, or statements are published in the journal. In any case, the contents of the articles and advertisements published in the PEARL Journal, LPPM Universitas Buddhi Dharma, are the sole and exclusive responsibility of their respective authors and advertisers.
Referensi
Agwu, A. ., & Adeniran, A. . (2010). Sources of Agricultural Information Used by Arable Crop Farmers in Isale Osun Farm Settlement, Osogbo Local Government Area of Osun State. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.4314/jae.v13i1.53872
Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Biswas, A., & Roy, M. (2015). Green products: an exploratory study on the consumer behaviour in emerging economies of the East. Journal of Cleaner Production, 87, 463–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.075
Chen, Y.-S. (2010). The Drivers of Green Brand Equity: Green Brand Image, Green Satisfaction, and Green Trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9
Chen, Y.-S., & Chang, C.-H. (2013). Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk. Journal of Business Ethics, 114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1360-0
Delafrooz, N., Taleghani, M., & Nouri, B. (2014). Effect of green marketing on consumer purchase behavior. QScience Connect, 2014, 5. https://doi.org/10.5339/connect.2014.5
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Gudergan, S. P., Fischer, A., Nitzl, C., & Menictas, C. (2019). Partial least squares structural equation modeling-based discrete choice modeling: an illustration in modeling retailer choice. Business Research, 12(1), 115–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-018-0072-4
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2015). Factors Affecting Green Purchase Behaviour and Future Research Directions. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ism.2015.04.001
Kumar, P., Polonsky, M., Dwivedi, Y., & Kar, A. (2021). Green information quality and green brand evaluation: the moderating effects of eco-label credibility and consumer knowledge. European Journal of Marketing, ahead-of-print. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2019-0808
Lee, K. (2009). Gender Differences in Hong Kong Adolescent Consumers’ Green Purchasing Behavior. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 26, 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760910940456
Leonidou, L., Leonidou, C., & Kvasova, O. (2010). Antecedents and Outcomes of Consumer Environmentally-Friendly Attitudes and Behavior. Journal of Marketing Management, 26, 1319–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2010.523710
Levin, K. A. (2006). Study design III: Cross-sectional studies. Evidence-Based Dentistry, 7(1), 24–25. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ebd.6400375
Mohamed, M. (2007). Gender differences in Egyptian consumers’ green purchase behavior: The effects of environmental knowledge, concern and attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
Nwoba, M. O. E., Nwonu, C. O., & Agbaeze, E. K. (2017). Impact of Fallen Oil Prices on the Nigeria Economy. Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, 33(April), 75–82.
Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H., & Paladino, A. (2014). Perceived Greenwashing: The Interactive Effects of Green Advertising and Corporate Environmental Performance on Consumer Reactions. Journal of Business Ethics, 125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1944-3
OECD. (2016). Financial Education in Europe. In Financial Education in Europe. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264254855-en
Peattie, K., & Crane, A. (2005). Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophesy? In Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal (Vol. 8, Issue 4, pp. 357–370). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510619733
Prakash, G., & Pathak, P. (2017). Intention to buy eco-friendly packaged products among young consumers of India: A study on developing nation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.116
Rahbar, E., & Wahid, N. (2011). Investigation of green marketing tools’ effect on consumers’ purchase behavior. Business Strategy Series, 12, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/17515631111114877
Setia, M. S. (2016). Methodology series module 3: Cross-sectional studies. Indian Journal of Dermatology, 61(3), 261–264. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5154.182410
Yadav, R., & Pathak, G. S. (2017). Determinants of Consumers’ Green Purchase Behavior in a Developing Nation: Applying and Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ecological Economics, 134, 114–122. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.12.019
Abstract views: 146
/
PDF downloads: 158