Presenteeism in Cigarette Workers in the Light of Job Insecurity and Job Demands

Main Article Content

Authors

    Putri Amanda Meilala( 1 ) Trubus Raharjo( 2 )

    (1) Muria Kudus University | Indonesia
    (2) Muria Kudus University | Indonesia

Abstract

This study aims to examine the relationship between job insecurity, job demands, and presenteeism among cigarette factory workers. Presenteeism refers to employees’ tendency to remain physically present at work despite experiencing physical or psychological health problems that may reduce work effectiveness. This study employed a quantitative correlational design involving cigarette factory workers selected through accidental sampling. Data were collected using three validated measurement scales, namely the presenteeism scale, job insecurity scale, and job demands scale. The data were analyzed using Pearson correlation and two-predictor regression analysis. The results showed a significant positive relationship between job insecurity, job demands, and presenteeism, with a correlation coefficient of 0.647 and a significance level of p < 0.01. Job insecurity and job demands jointly contributed 41.8% to presenteeism. Further analysis indicated that job insecurity had a positive relationship with presenteeism (r = 0.629; p < 0.01), while job demands were also positively associated with presenteeism (r = 0.546; p < 0.01). These findings indicate that workers who experience higher job insecurity and greater job demands are more likely to continue working despite being in poor physical or psychological condition. Practically, the results suggest that organizations need to reduce excessive job demands, improve perceived job security, and strengthen employee well-being policies to minimize presenteeism and maintain workplace productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
P. A. Meilala and Trubus Raharjo, “Presenteeism in Cigarette Workers in the Light of Job Insecurity and Job Demands”, rubin, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 103–118, Jun. 2026.
Section
Articles

References

Abdul Jalil, N. I., Tan, S. A., Ibharim, N. S., Musa, A. Z., Ang, S. H., & Mangundjaya, W. L. (2023). The Relationship between Job Insecurity and Psychological Well-Being among Malaysian Precarious Workers: Work–Life Balance as a Mediator. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(3), 2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032758

Aronsson, G., Gustafsson, K., & Dallner, M. (2000). Sick but yet at work. An empirical study of sickness presenteeism. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 54(7), 502–509. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.54.7.502

Aronsson, G., Hagberg, J., Bjorklund, C., Aboagye, E., Marklund, S., Leineweber, C., & Bergström, G. (2021). Health and motivation as mediators of the effects of job demands, job control, job support, and role conflicts at work and home on sickness presenteeism and absenteeism. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 94(3), 409–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-020-01591-w

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115

Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056

Berthelsen, H., Westerlund, H., Bergstrom, G., & Burr, H. (2020). Validation of the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire Version III and Establishment of Benchmarks for Psychosocial Risk Management in Sweden. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(9), 3179. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093179

Biron, C., Karanika-Murray, M., & Ivers, H. (2022). The health-performance framework of presenteeism: A proof-of-concept study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029434

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quinonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (2019). Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments. Psychological Assessment, 31(12), 1412–1427. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000626

Curran, P. G. (2016). Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 66, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.07.006

Demerouti, E., Le Blanc, P. M., Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hox, J. (2009). Present but sick: A three-wave study on job demands, presenteeism and burnout. Career Development International, 14(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1108/13620430910933574

Dutheil, F., Pereira, B., Bouillon-Minois, J.-B., Clinchamps, M., Brousses, G., Dewavrin, S., Cornet, T., Mermillod, M., Mondillon, L., Baker, J. S., Schmidt, J., Moustafa, F., & Lanhers, C. (2022). Validation of Visual Analogue Scales of job demand and job control at the workplace: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 12(3), e046403. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046403

Etikan, I. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Gillet, N., Huyghebaert-Zouaghi, T., Reveillere, C., Colombat, P., & Fouquereau, E. (2020). The effects of job demands on nurses’ burnout and presenteeism through sleep quality and relaxation. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 29(3–4), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15116

Goldammer, P., Annen, H., Stöckli, P. L., & Jonas, K. (2020). Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(4), 101384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101384

Homrich, P. H. P., Dantas-Filho, F. F., Martins, L. L., & Marcon, E. R. (2020). Presenteeism among health care workers: literature review. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Do Trabalho, 18(1), 97–102. https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1679443520200478

Hongsa, T., & Polyong, C. P. (2024). Prevalence and Factors Associated with Sickness Presenteeism among Thai and Foreign Teachers Following the End of COVID-19 Public Health Emergency of International Concern. Korean Journal of Family Medicine, 45(6), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0224

Karanika-Murray, M., & Biron, C. (2020). The health-performance framework of presenteeism: Towards understanding an adaptive behaviour. Human Relations, 73(2), 242–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719827081

Kim, H.-Y. (2019). Statistical notes for clinical researchers: simple linear regression 3 – residual analysis. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics, 44(1). https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e11

Kim, J.-H., Yoon, J., Bahk, J., & Kim, S.-S. (2020). Job insecurity is associated with presenteeism, but not with absenteeism: A study of 19,720 full-time waged workers in South Korea. Journal of Occupational Health, 62(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12143

Knief, U., & Forstmeier, W. (2021). Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2576–2590. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01587-5

Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Quantitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264622

Llosa, J. A., Agulló-Tomás, E., Menéndez-Espina, S., Heleno, C. T., & de Olivera Borges, L. (2023). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Job Insecurity Scale (JIS) in Brazil and cross-national analysis of Job Insecurity effects in Brazil and Spain. BMC Psychology, 11(1), 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01156-9

Lohaus, D., & Habermann, W. (2019). Presenteeism: A review and research directions. Human Resource Management Review, 29(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.02.010

McGregor, A., Iverson, D., Caputi, P., Magee, C., & Ashbury, F. (2014). Relationships Between Work Environment Factors and Presenteeism Mediated by Employees’ Health. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 56(12), 1319–1324. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000000263

McGregor, A., Magee, C. A., Caputi, P., & Iverson, D. (2016). A job demands-resources approach to presenteeism. Career Development International, 21(4), 402–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0002

Min, A., & Hong, H. C. (2023). The Effects of Job Demand-control-support Profiles on Presenteeism: Evidence from the Sixth Korean Working Condition Survey. Safety and Health at Work, 14(1), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2022.12.001

Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS Survival Manual. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003117452

Patel, C., Biron, M., Cooper, S. C., & Budhwar, P. S. (2023). Sick and working: Current challenges and emerging directions for future presenteeism research. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(6), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2727

Schmidt, K., & Pförtner, T.-K. (2020). Job Insecurity, Sickness Presenteeism and the Moderating Effect of Workplace Health Promotion. Journal of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, 62(11), 937–942. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001997

Schober, P., Boer, C., & Schwarte, L. A. (2018). Correlation Coefficients: Appropriate Use and Interpretation. Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), 1763–1768. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002864

Sharkawi, S. (2021). The Effects of Job Insecurity, Job Demand, and Health Issues Towards Presenteeism In A Malaysian Government-Linked Company. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijhrs.v11i3.18536

Shoss, M. K. (2017). Job Insecurity: An Integrative Review and Agenda for Future Research. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1911–1939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317691574

Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2


Abstract views: 16 / PDF downloads: 8